Posts Tagged ‘flirty’

Burlesque Hall Of Fame

Monday, May 9th, 2011

 

Stripper Halls of Fame Take Gloves Off
By NICK DIVITO
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
LAS VEGAS (CN) – The Burlesque Hall of Fame aka the “Stripper Museum in the middle of the Mojave Desert,” has come to blows with one of its former board members, whom it claims stole its identity and props to mount a competing venue.

The Burlesque Hall of Fame was founded in 1955 by Jennie Lee, a burlesque performer who also established the Exotique Dancers League of North America as a burlesque entertainers’ trade union.
Lee hosted gatherings for “members of the burlesque league” at her California home and night club “since at least as early as 1957,” according to the federal complaint. “These gatherings have included an awards element, recognizing excellence in the field of burlesque.”
Lee announced plans for the Burlesque Hall of Fame in 1965, and invitations were sent out.
Lee owned both The Blue Viking and The Sassy Lassy nightclubs in San Pedro, Calif., the latter of which is “widely recognized as the first public home of the ‘Burlesque Hall of Fame,” the complaint states.
The Sassy Lassy name and trademark has been used ever since on T-shirts, matchbooks and programs to promote reunions and burlesque events.
Lee and her husband, Charlie Arroyo, bought a 40-acre plot of land in Helendale, Calif., in the 1980s with the “intent of building ‘Jennie Lee’s Exotic World,’ incorporating a permanent burlesque museum, a ‘striptease school’ and a retirement community for elderly exotic dancers,” according to the complaint.
Jennie Lee died in 1990 “before her plans were fully realized.”
In 1990, former exotic dancer Mary Lee “Dixie” Evans moved to Helendale to care for Jennie Lee, and after her death, worked with Arroyo to help Lee’s dream become a reality.
They created the “Miss Exotic World Pageant,” “intending to draw attention to the art of burlesque and the fledgling Burlesque Hall of Fame Museum,” the lawsuit states.
The museum was incorporated as a California Public Benefit Corporation in 1998.
In 2000, Laura Herbert, a current board member for the Hall of Fame, first heard of this “stripper museum in the middle of the Mojave Desert,” and visited with her then-boyfriend, defendant Luke Littell, also a board member and pageant producer.
In 2002, Herbert launched a Miss Exotic World website to promote the pageant, and it became a “hub of the burgeoning neo-burlesque movement” with 1,800 members strong, the lawsuit states.
The event and museum outgrew the ranch, however, and Herbert and Littell sought out new locations for the pageant and museum, finally settling on East Fremont Street.
The show ran from 2006 to 2009 with increasing popularity. It was through staging the show at the Celebrity Theater that Herbert and Littell met defendant Frederic Apcar Jr., then part-owner of the theater, who said he was a member of a “well-known and affluent Las Vegas entertainment/show producer family,” according to the complaint.
Although the Hall of Fame and Apcar and Littell did not enter into a formal agreement, it was understood that in 2010, Apcar and Littell would produce the Burlesque Hall of Fame Weekend at the Plaza Hotel on Fremont Street.
After producing the event, the two “took possession of certain property belonging to the [Burlesque Hall of Fame], including items of the stage set and props from the event, memorabilia, T-shirts and other merchandise,” the complaint states.
Apcar and Littel also failed to pay the $30,000 minimum to the Burlesque Hall of Fame as promised, the plaintiff claims.
“When Apcar and Littel realized that the [Hall of Fame] would not sanction their handling of the 2001 Burlesque Hall of Fame Weekend and pageant, they surreptitiously entered into their own contract with the Plaza Hotel for their own burlesque event,” thereby precluding the Burlesque Hall of Fame from “holding its event there a second time,” the lawsuit states.
“More egregiously,” the lawsuit states, “Apcar and Littell used their prior connection with the 2010 Burlesque Hall of Fame Weekend and pageant to induce the Plaza Hotel to host the event in 2011.”
The Burlesque Hall of Fame says that Apcar and Littell have advertised their own 2011 burlesque event for the same weekend that the Hall of Fame intends to hold its event, and are using its Sassy Lassy Burlesque marks without permission.
The defendants are “taking in application fees, vending, retail and advertising fees and other income amounting to tens of thousands of dollars under the guise that their burlesque show is affiliated with and or sanctioned by plaintiff’s original and renowned Burlesque Hall of Fame,” according to the complaint.
Several burlesque pageant performers and attendees are boycotting the plaintiff’s event because of the confusion as to “which is the ‘real show’ and ‘to wait and see who is still standing in 2012,’” the Hall of Fame says.
It wants the defendants ordered to stop using its marks, and seeks compensatory, consequential, statutory and punitive damages for trademark violations, cybersquatting, unfair competition, deceptive trade practices, and breach of contract.
The Burlesque Hall of Fame is represented by Mark Tratos with Greenberg Traurig.

Strip club ‘would be a disaster’

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Strip club ‘would be a disaster’

A lap dancing and strip club in Wolverhampton city centre would be a “formula for disaster”, according to police bosses who have strongly objected to the plans.

Divas, which would transform a former bar and restaurant opposite one of the city’s main churches, has attracted a wave of protests from official agencies and local businesses.

Businessman Dharam Singh Jagpal wants to open a “gentlemen’s club” in Darlington Street aimed at Asian men which would employ women wearing traditional dress. He has applied for an all-night licence.

But police chiefs say they have serious concerns about the potential for crime and disorder at the club and accuse Mr Jagpal, aged 26, of putting little research into his application. The fire authority and environment services have also lodged complaints.

In a letter to the city council, Wolverhampton police licensing officer Natalie Holt says: “The operation in question covers alcohol consumption, sexual arousement and late-night opening.

“In fact, it would be the only place in the city to get a drink at that time, which the police see as a formula for disaster.”

She says Mr Jagpal has failed to address a number of issues, including the siting of three booths for private dances. For the women’s safety, there would need to be at least eight permanent security staff.

The police also argue that entry to the club would be via a quiet street, leaving it vulnerable to street robberies and attacks.

Councillor Roger Lawrence, leader of Wolverhampton Labour Group, who represents the area, has raised concerns about the congregating of men, possibly under the influence of drink, at unsuitable hours.

Mr Jagpal has applied for a licence from 9am through to 6.30am the following day.

Estate agents Whitegates has written a strongly worded objection.

The application will be discussed at a licensing sub-committee meeting.

See Also:

Sign up for Fantasy Football 2009-2010 – win £2,000 in cash, with other prizes up for grabs
Share you news, photos, audio clips and videos with the Express & Star
This article posted on August 5, 2009 at 11:30 am

County, strip club feud spills into court

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

County, strip club feud spills into court
By: William C. Flook
Examiner Staff Writer
August 6, 2009

Paper Moon, a Springfield strip club that has operated under Fairfax County’s microscope since it opened a year ago, is asking a judge to reverse the county’s recent crackdown on it.

As one of only two gentleman’s clubs in Fairfax, Paper Moon’s activities have been the subject of extraordinary scrutiny by authorities, who in December cited the club for a handful of parking and occupancy violations. The county has told the Amherst Avenue establishment to correct the problems or shut its doors.

Some neighbors and revitalization groups are hoping for the latter outcome. They see Paper Moon’s presence as a hindrance to economic development in an area desperately in need of it. Lee District Supervisor Jeff McKay, a longtime critic of Paper Moon, denied it was being singled out, however.

“I don’t care what kind of business they’re operating; if they’re in violation of our county codes and ordinances, then they deserve to be in court,” McKay said. “There are laws in our county, and if you break them, we ought to be taking you to task for them.”

The contention stems from the club’s peculiar legal situation. Its predecessor, the Dauphine Steakhouse, was grandfathered as a “commercial nudity establishment” when the use was prohibited in the area in 1980. Paper Moon inherited that exception — but, because it must retain Dauphine’s exact footprint, the club is not allowed to expand in any way.

Paper Moon, in a circuit court filing challenging the Fairfax County Board of Zoning Appeals, says the citations are unwarranted. County authorities say the building exceeded maximum occupancy of 104. The club claims it can legally hold twice as many people.

Paper Moon is the only business on its lot but is only allowed a limited area in which its patrons can park. McKay said inspectors found patrons parking in spaces outside that area — spaces designated for tenants that have since closed up shop — resulting in another citation.

Paper Moon has kept a low profile as a business and has maintained the “curb appeal” of the property, said Nancy-Jo Manney, executive director of the Greater Springfield Chamber of Commerce.

“Is it a desired business in the community? No, it is not,” she said.

Officials with the business in Springfield and at the chain’s headquarters in Richmond did not return calls for comment.

Strip club expansion uncertain, but it certainly doesn’t fit in

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Strip club expansion uncertain, but it certainly doesn’t fit in
MIKE HENDRICKS COMMENTARY

Will the Crossroads district become home to yet another strip club?

Or are the folks who run the “Totally Nude” juice bar, aka Temptations, toying with City Hall by putting up a sign on the vacant building next door that seems to promise another sexually oriented business on Grand Boulevard?

No answers so far, as the lawyer representing the business — or businesses — hasn’t made it clear to city officials — or returned reporters’ phone calls.

But say this for that bright yellow awning at 1515 Grand Blvd.: You can’t miss it.

Not with “Barely Legal” in big, black letters just a block or so from the Sprint Center.

“When you put up a sign like that, it raises eyebrows,” said inspector Derrick Lloyd in the city’s Planning and Development Department.

Eyebrows and hackles both.

“It’s absolutely frustrating to the (neighboring) property owners,” said David Morris, president of the Crossroads Merchants Association.

From the parks board to the Regulated Industries Division, there’s no lack of interest at City Hall.

“So far, no one has applied for a license to operate any kind of a business there,” said regulated industries chief Gary Majors.

But concerns about the sign — and what it might portend — have city lawyers mining the municipal code for answers to whether the “Barely Legal” sign is itself legal.

“We don’t think it is,” said Denise Phillips at the Department of Parks and Recreation, which regulates the city’s boulevard system.

As the awning juts into the public right of way, it might be in violation of the city code governing boulevards, she said.

Or not, depending on whether the awning was there before Grand became part of the boulevard system in 1988.

Meanwhile, city lawyers are trying to determine how the sign ordinance applies while Lloyd and his crew keep an eye out for permit violations.

“We’ve been by there every day,” he said.

Of course, none of this would be at issue had the City Council done the smart thing in 2008 and allowed Temptations to expand into the building next door.

Class the place up a bit — that was the idea. Get a liquor license, which would mean no more nude entertainment. Dancers would have to wear pasties at the very least.

Therefore, Crossroads merchants might have said goodbye forever to the “Totally Nude” sign, which is not at all in keeping with the area’s ever-so-trendy image. In September, an international TV audience will be watching as some of the top bicycle racers in the world zip past in the Tour of Missouri.

But no. The council caved to pressure from prudes who felt the expansion would lead to more sexually oriented businesses.

Yeah, well, that sure worked out swell now, didn’t it?

“I was for it,” Morris said. “It was certainly better than what we’ve got now.”

Which is barely legal — or not.

To reach Mike Hendricks, call 816-234-7708 or send e-mail to mhendricks@kcstar.com.

Judge rules patrons can’t bring liquor to Sayreville strip club

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Judge rules patrons can’t bring liquor to Sayreville strip club
by Aliyah Shahid/For The Star-Ledger
Friday August 07, 2009, 11:46 AM

SAYREVILLE — Patrons of a Sayreville strip club should plan on leaving their beer and wine at home, now that a Superior Court judge has dismissed an injunction he issued last month allowing the practice to continue.

‘Attendants at Yankee Stadium or Giants Stadium will be the same if beer is served or not. People are going for the game, not for the food or liquor.” — Superior Court Judge Glenn Berman

The injunction was placed on an ordinance Sayreville passed last month, prohibiting establishments without liquor licenses — except restaurants — from allowing customers to bring their own alcohol.

Greg Vella, an attorney representing 35 Club, also known as XXXV Gentleman’s Club, on Route 35, said the rule is discriminatory and singles out XXXV because of the risque nature of the business.

Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Glenn Berman, sitting in New Brunswick, ruled today that Club 35 did not demonstrate that it would be significantly harmed because of the BYOB ordinance. He said patrons go to such clubs for entertainment, not necessarily because they can bring their own beer or wine. He drew similarities between patrons at a strip club and those at a baseball game.

“Attendants at Yankee Stadium or Giants Stadium will be the same if beer is served or not,” said Berman. “People are going for the game, not for the food or liquor.”

The law, which took effect shortly after its unanimous passage on July 13, also limits the amount of alcohol customers may bring to a restaurant (enough for three people). In addition, restaurants may not charge an admission fee, membership fee, cover, corkage, or service charge. And, restaurants may not advertise that they are BYOB.

The new law also defines a restaurant as “having an adequate kitchen,” “served at tables by a restaurant employee” and “customers are provided an individual menu.”

Vella argued that XXXV has had no problems since they’ve been BYOB for two years, and that the law is subjective and an abuse of police power because officers will determine what an adequate restaurant entails.

“There’s no rational connection,” said Vella, who argued that the borough should either permit or ban all establishments that have BYOB. “It creates different classes of competition and a different class of citizens. It’s unfair competition.”

Gregory Bevelock, an attorney representing Sayreville, said the ordinance was created because the borough had problems with owners who abandoned their liquor licenses, which were in danger of being revoked and operated as BYOB establishments instead. Problems, like noise and violence, have persisted.

Bevelock also said there is no evidence that XXXV would be hurt financially because of the ordinance, and that competition is fair because the patrons of restaurants and strip clubs are not the same.

“This is based on the nonsensical notion that an all-nude dance club competes with restaurants,” said Bevelock.

Jeff Bertrand, the borough’s business administrator said the ordinance was not created to single out any particular establishment, and that some municipalities, including Wall Township and Rahway have similar ordinances.

The club is currently in litigation for allegedly violating a zoning law that states the club isn’t allowed to operate within 1,000 feet of homes or public parks.

The court will reconvene in October, when there will be a trial to determine if the ordinance is valid or not, said Vella. Until then, BYOB will be illegal at XXXV.

“We’re disappointed,” said Vella. “But, we’ll continue to fight this.”

Suspect named in killing at strip club arizona daily star

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Tucson Region
Suspect named in killing at strip club
By Phil Villarreal
arizona daily star
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 08.08.2009

Tucson police have obtained an arrest warrant for a man suspected in the killing of David H. Tyne outside the Candy Store strip club July 30.
Police are looking for Andre “Dre” Lightsey-Copeland, 28. Copeland is 5 feet 10 inches tall, weighs 150 pounds and has brown hair and eyes. He’s considered armed and dangerous, police said.
On July 30 at 5:02 p.m., police say a man confronted Tyne inside the strip club, on South Craycroft Road near East 22nd Street. One man lured Tyne outside where the other man was waiting, and Tyne was shot. He was taken to University Medical Center, where he was pronounced dead.
One of the men drove away in a white 2005 Chevrolet Impala with Arizona license plate AFW2356 while the other man fled on foot.
Anyone who spots Copeland or the vehicle should call 911 or 88-CRIME.
Contact reporter Phil Villarreal at 573-4130 or pvillarreal@azstarnet.com

Tucson police have obtained an arrest warrant for a man suspected in the killing of David H. Tyne outside the Candy Store strip club July 30.

Air workers in calendar stripper row

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Air workers in calendar stripper row
By Stephen Moyes 22/12/2008

Fun Stories to read from the past

Airport staff were banned from making a nude charity calendar because bosses thought it might put off potential buyers of Gatwick.

The fundraiser for children with cerebral palsy was to feature 40 men posing for raunchy shots round the site.

It had won the backing of the managing director.

But just as workers were ready to strip, the new director of communications banned the shoot as he felt it was inappropriate.

Calendar organiser Alan Skinner was told bad press could affect the airport’s sale.

The BAA security guard said: “I’ve no idea how a calendar with workers raising funds for charity would influence this. If anything it would have shown we’re a forward thinking company. I’m sure we’d have sold hundreds.”

BAA Gatwick replied: “The idea showed real creativity, but the calendar boys theme was felt inappropriate in a work situation. It is important we work hard to protect the airport’s reputation.”

CU student aims to open topless café in Boulder

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

CU student aims to open topless café in Boulder
By Amy Bounds (Contact)
Monday, July 6, 2009

BOULDER, Colo. — Boulder’s Dan Kennedy wants to open a coffee shop — but instead of competing with the likes of Starbucks by offering specialty drinks, he wants to steam up basic coffee and pre-packaged pastries with topless waitresses.

He’s looking to open a shop in August, one day a week in the morning.

Kennedy — who said he will be a sophomore at the University of Colorado in the fall after transferring from Whitman College in Washington — has placed ads on Craigslist for bouncers and women willing to work topless, saying he’s interviewing three women and three potential bouncers Friday. He’s offering to pay the women $80 to $100 for a morning.

But he said he’s still researching the steps he needs to make the cafe legal. He also needs a location. His ideal spot would be a conference room at CU, though he’s also looking on University Hill.

By offering only drip coffee and prepackaged food, he said, “There’s no license and no regulations.”

But, CU spokesman Bronson Hilliard said, there are strict regulations governing businesses on campus — plus a student code of conduct that would prohibit operating an adult business at the university.

He said students can rent conference rooms for “normal campus activities,” such as study groups. Bottom line, he said, a topless coffee shop “is not going to be allowed.”

“This is a half-baked idea,” he said.

Kennedy said CU students are a big part of his target audience, and he’s considering charging a $12 cover fee to avoid attracting a crowd just looking to ogle the waitresses.

His job listing for the bouncer says the employee “will be checking IDs to make sure they are 18 plus. Making sure topless girls feel safe and no inappropriate behavior from customers.”

He acknowledged that some people likely will object to his risque business venture.

“It’s probably going to cause a pretty big stir,” he said.

A controversial topless coffee shop in a rural Maine town drew national attention — and was burned down in June by an arsonist after just four months in business. Before the fire, the owner had received 150 applications for 10 positions.

Locally, a strip club off the Pearl Street Mall that opened in late 2007 drew concerns from zoning and building-code officials soon after it opened. The city recently looked into ways to regulate adult businesses before they opened, but the Boulder City Council has yet to agree to any changes.

The city’s options include using zoning rules to limit where such establishments could open. Some cities, for example, forbid strip clubs from doing business within 1,500 feet of a church, school, child-care center, park or other adults-only venue.

The city could decide to issue licenses to strip clubs instead, a process that could resemble the way liquor licenses are handed out now.

Mayor Matt Appelbaum said it may be worth looking at the zoning regulations and giving the community a chance to offer feedback.

“Our regulations don’t really preclude these businesses,” he said. “There clearly are locations where they are not appropriate.”

City Councilwoman Susan Osborne said she doesn’t want the council to spend time on the issue, adding that she hasn’t seen much of a market for strip clubs and similar adult businesses in Boulder.

“There are so many big things going on right now,” she said. “This would just be a distraction.”

Take me out to the strip club… Judge says play ball

Monday, July 27th, 2009

Ah, baseball.

America’s pastime. Cracker Jack. Cold beer. Hot dogs.

And body glitter?

That’s the upshot of a decision issued Friday by a King County Superior Court judge, who cleared the way for a proposed Déjà Vu strip club — adult cabaret in the court’s parlance — near Safeco Field.

Stripper’s pole meets foul pole.

Over the objections of the Seattle Mariners and the public utility that operates the field, Judge John Erlick found that the City of Seattle did not err in permitting the proposed First Avenue club.

Erlick rejected the Mariners assertion that the City Council meant to keep strip clubs at least 800 feet away from “areas where children congregate” or sports arenas. That language is absent from the city ordinance drafted after Seattle’s wholesale ban on new strip clubs was rejected as unconstitutional.

“If (the council) had intended to require dispersion from all places where children tend to congregate, it would have specifically included that language,” Erlick said Friday. “This court refuses to read words into the ordinance which do not exist in the plain language.”

During an earlier hearing, attorneys for the Mariners argued that the city had erred in permitting the club because Safeco should be considered a park or open space. One area the Mariners pointed to was a park is primarily used for bus parking; another is private property that may be developed in the future.

The proposed Déjà Vu would be on First Avenue South just south of Safeco Field, about 400 feet from the main home-plate entrance. The rear door of the club would be about 120 feet from a parking garage plaza where school buses frequently drop off students attending games.

Opponents of the club will decide in coming days whether to appeal Erlick’s ruling, said Bart Waldman, Mariners executive vice president for governmental affairs.

“We’re obviously disappointed,” Waldman said. “For now, we’re just going to absorb the opinion.”

Lauding the ruling, Peter Buck, attorney for the club owners, said the Mariners’ moralizing throughout the legal proceeding strained credulity.

Buck dismissed the Mariners’ assertions that children would be harmed by the strip club as specious.

Buck noted that a Déjà Vu club across First Avenue from Pike Place Market has done little to discourage or offend tourists there. And, like all Washington state strip clubs, the proposed facility will not serve alcohol.

The Mariners, however, do at Safeco Field.

“The Mariners mainly made a moral pitch, that this facility would be harmful to children,” Buck said. “If they were really worried about children, they’d clean up their own act.”

Erlick’s ruling marked the first serious test of the 4-year-old restrictions on where strip clubs can be. Buck praised it as showing that business owners can get a fair shake, regardless of the business they’re in.

“It means that an operation such as my client’s can rely on the law as it is written,” Buck said. “This law isn’t about someone’s moral values.”

The Mariners have 30 days to file an appeal. If the team doesn’t appeal, Buck said the club will likely open in six months.

Safeco Fields raunchy new neighbor, a strip club, prevails in court

Monday, July 27th, 2009

Strip clubs are back in the headlines, and they add to the cringe factor of an adult-entertainment venue opening up for lap dances next to Safeco Field, the home of the Seattle Mariners.

SEATTLE’S sleazy experience with strip clubs stirs genuine indignation at the prospects of one these degrading establishments opening so close to Safeco Field.

Last week, a King County Superior Court judge announced he could find nothing in the law or in the city of Seattle’s interpretation and application of land-use regulations to stop City Hall from issuing a business permit to Roger Forbes for a strip club in the Sodo area on First Avenue South.

Judge John Erlick worked with the law and facts before him, and his 11-page analysis indicates he was looking for mistakes, overstepping and sloppy use of words. He found none. The Seattle City Council had not used early opportunities to add stadiums — spectator-sports facilities — to the list of land uses and activities that could pre-empt or exile adult entertainment from a neighborhood.

Strip clubs in Seattle are as likely to be viewed as ersatz brothels as they are dingy gathering places for lonely men to sip overpriced soft drinks and ogle the female form. Lap dancing is prostitution by another name.

Law-enforcement issues with strip clubs have a long history, and the headlines are never dormant for long. Check out the latest round of indictments surrounding four clubs that federal charges conclude were no more than whorehouses.

Slimy dealings between strip-club associates and members of the City Council gave the community a political and campaign-finance scandal — memorialized as Strippergate — that yielded guilty pleas, stunted careers and smeared reputations.

Such is the legacy of the sex industry that will be the Mariners’ new neighbor. Baseball fans, young and old, are not going to be pleased to see the neon signs and ads promoting amateur night or the special appearance of a porn star.

The business is degrading to women. These are not victimless enterprises. Promoting base and destructive attitudes toward women is hardly a desirable welcome mat so near a signature, public-gathering place.

Is this a moralistic harangue? Yes it is. Is there a place for adult entertainment in a community? The courts all say so. Next door to Safeco Field is not the place. Somewhere in Sodo might be appropriate, but this establishment is too damn close to families and a general public that is insulted and offended by the intrusion.